| CineMotion Improves CineLook By Frank McMahon Monday March 8, 1999, 12:09 AM PST Click Here To Return To DesignInMotion CineMotion, DigiEffects newest plug-in for the Mac version of Adobe After Effects (the 95/98/NT/2000 version is slated to ship second quarter), builds upon the highly-praised CineLook What is the main difference between CineMotion and CineLook? "CineLook does not do 3:2 pulldown," explained DigiEffects director of engineering Chris Athanas. When Athanas talks plug-ins, he knows the ropes. Besides programming the DigiEffects family of plug-ins, his vast background includes stints at several other media companies, including Xaos, where he created plug-ins such as Paint Alchemy, Terrazo and Typecaster. "When you are processing video Rob Birnholz, owner of Absolute Motion Graphics in Orlando, Florida uses CineMotion on a wide range of projects, with clients such as Disney and the Orlando Magic basketball team. "Two weeks ago, we were putting together a commercial for the Orlando Magic and we wanted to use a tight close-up of the owner," said Birnholz. "The only problem was that the motion had an unappealing strobe effect to it. We used CineMotion on just that particular shot and it improved the look dramatically." Birnholz said they don't always use CineMotion for the film-look process. "We actually use it more for frame-rate conversions, however, when we do need filmlook, it is obvious that the CineMotion plug-in provides better output when used with CineLook, as opposed to just using CineLook by itself." Birnholz confirms that the product does improve on the built-in filters in After Effects. "We tried After Effect's 3:2 pull down on a recent shot of some race cars where we had to match them up with existing film footage. There was a scene where some signage that moved behind a car jumped all over with the Adobe filter. We could not get it looking smooth. So we applied CineMotion and it provided the right fix. Another recent example was a piece where we applied CineLook over some slow motion horizontal pans across an actor's eyes. We still had some stuttering, but applying CineMotion in addition created a smoother more natural feel." If there was an addition Birnholz would recommend, it would be more built-in presets for future upgrades. "Also, in addition to more presets, it would be nice to have a deeper explanation of what each of the settings actually mean. I begin with the presets that ship with the product, and then tweak from there. So more guidance to recreate specific effects, as well as better clarification of each parameter, would be helpful." At KEZI-TV in Eugene, Oregon, senior producer Rod Butler shoots primarily in Beta SP. However his clients still want the film look. "We have been using CineLook for a while and the results have been OK, however running the footage through the
Butler does realize the drawbacks to using such an intensive plug-in. "Well, the render times do take a while, but that actually may be more a drawback of our current equipment, which could probably be upgraded," Butler admits. "I typically move the frames to an Iomega Jaz drive and render the section on various other systems. But it is worth it to offer this professional service. The film-look has definitely increased our profits for such a modest investment, clients are definitely more satisfied." Butler also wishes for more presets, especially those in the 35mm range. He hopes to see additional advances such as the Film Damage plug-in that is part of CineLook. He says CineLook's Film Damage, combined with CineMotion, provides realistic film-look results. While CineLook provides the color and grain effects for processing 60 fields-per-second footage, CineMotion covers the filmic motion effects using a variety of plug-in tools. CineMotion is currently available from DigiEffects for Adobe After Effects, with future ports to cover the Avid Media Composer and Xpress systems.
|
|||
|
|